v1.3.3: Lex priority comparator + warm-cache cap + score display
The v1.3.1 comparator used a sum-of-weights priorityScore. With weights
15..1 across 15 specs, three lower-priority specs (BNK+BRM+CRF, sum 39)
could outrank a single top-priority spec (HCR alone, sum 15). In
priority-order mode this surfaced lower-priority plans above the user's
top spec — the opposite of intent.
Fix: replace sum-of-weights with a lexicographic rank weight. Each spec
encodes as a bit, top-ranked spec = highest bit. So [HCR] = 16384 beats
[BNK,BRM,CRF,EMT,ENT,FIN,FIM,GLB,LCM,MGT,MKT,MTO,SBI,STR] = 16383. A plan
containing a higher-ranked spec ALWAYS outranks any plan that doesn't,
regardless of how many lower-ranked specs the latter contains. Lower
specs only act as tiebreakers among plans that all contain the same
higher-ranked spec.
Both modes use lex weight as the priority key; modes still differ in
ordering:
priority-order: (rankWeight desc, count desc, key asc)
maximize-count: (count desc, rankWeight desc, key asc)
Score display changes from the legacy sum (e.g. "score 29") to the lex
weight in compact form (e.g. "score 24.6k"). Hover for full integer.
The display now actually corresponds to ranking order.
Other:
- Cache cap (500k leaves) now retains existing entries instead of
clearing on overflow. New entries past the cap are dropped; the
cached subset stays available as a warm starting point.
- Two new lex-weight tests in searchDecisionTree.test.ts:
- single top-ranked spec outweighs all 14 others combined
- tiebreaker is the next-ranked spec
- All 84 tests pass; cached leaves stay valid across the comparator
change since achievedSpecs (the input to lex compare) is unchanged.
Files: solver/priority.ts (new functions), solver/decisionTree.ts
(comparators take ranking), components/{TopPlans,CourseSelection}.tsx
(score display + Recommended badge), state/appState.ts (cache-cap
behavior), vite.config.ts, CHANGELOG.md.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
|
||||
# Changelog
|
||||
|
||||
## v1.3.3 — 2026-05-09
|
||||
|
||||
### Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- **Lexicographic priority comparison** — fixes a scoring bug where combinations of lower-priority specializations could outrank a single higher-priority specialization in priority-order mode. The comparator now uses lex-by-rank: a plan containing a higher-ranked specialization always beats a plan that doesn't, regardless of how many lower-ranked specializations the latter contains. Lower-ranked specializations only act as tiebreakers among plans that all contain the same higher-ranked specs. Same logic also tiebreaks within maximize-count mode.
|
||||
- **Score display matches the comparator** — the per-plan score now shows the lexicographic rank weight in compact form (e.g. `score 24.6k`) instead of the legacy sum-of-weights. Hover the score for the full integer.
|
||||
- **Cache cap retains warm entries** — when the leaf cache hits the 500k cap, new entries are now dropped instead of clearing the cache; the existing 500k stay as a starting point for subsequent pin/unpin operations.
|
||||
- **Cache stays valid** across the comparator change — leaves cached under v1.3.2 still produce correct rankings under the new comparator since `achievedSpecs` (the input to lex compare) is unchanged.
|
||||
|
||||
## v1.3.2 — 2026-05-09
|
||||
|
||||
### Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user